The reviewer that was missing from the pipeline
AI tools made it possible for one person to ship a complete application in a weekend. What they did not ship was the reviewer who used to sit between writing code and releasing it.
- Free during early access
- No credit card
- Staging-first
- Evidence for every finding
Software used to be written line by line by people who understood every one of them, then checked by a second person before it reached anyone else. That process was slow, and it was the reason most embarrassing bugs never shipped.
Generation collapsed the first half of that process. A prompt now produces a working application before lunch. The second half, the checking, did not collapse with it, and in most projects it disappeared entirely. The result is a wave of apps that look finished, demo perfectly, and fail in production at the exact places nobody looked.
PushFix exists to put the missing half back. It is not a code reviewer and it never asks for your repository. It reviews the application the way the outside world sees it: crawling, inspecting, and reporting 284 checks across security, SEO, accessibility, performance and launch readiness, with the evidence attached to every single finding.
How we build the thing that checks your thing
These rules are not aspirational. Each one exists because the alternative produced a report that was not true.
Evidence over opinion
A finding without the request, response or screenshot behind it is a guess. Every PushFix finding ships with the observation that produced it, so a claim can be checked rather than believed.
Never overstate confidence
A missing header is a fact; a judgement about layout is an inference. PushFix reports the two differently and caps inferred findings at 0.60, because certainty you have not earned is worse than an honest guess.
Do no harm
Automated testing against a live product has to be safe by construction: staging-first, read-only by default, bounded request budgets and irreversible paths excluded up front.
Nothing hidden
No enterprise tier behind a sales call, no feature gated on an NDA, no audit that reports a pass it did not earn. What is implemented is documented, and what is not is labelled.
What PushFix is not
Being clear about the limits is part of being useful. A tool that claims everything is a tool you cannot trust on anything.
Read the comparisons or the security page for the detail behind each boundary.
- Not a penetration test, and never a replacement for one
- Not a code reviewer: no repository access, no agents, no build changes
- Not a load test, a brute-force tool or a denial-of-service tool
- Not a compliance certificate and not a guarantee of security
Put the reviewer
back in the pipeline.
Create a project, answer a few questions about your app, and get an evidence-backed review with copy-paste fix prompts.
Prefer to look around first? Compare plans